COMPARE · SONARQUBE
SonarQube vs Mapnostics
SonarQube gates code quality one file at a time — rule violations, coverage thresholds, a CI check that passes or fails. Mapnostics works at the system level: one health score across six measured dimensions, and a map of how the whole codebase connects.
Where Mapnostics is different
One system health score
A single number from 0 to 100, deducted across six measured dimensions — dead code, zombie code, file size, test coverage, secrets exposure and duplication — with every deduction capped and shown.
Learn more →Dead and zombie code across the whole graph
Mapnostics walks the call graph from every real entry point to find unused exports and whole orphaned clusters — not line-level rule violations.
Learn more →The dependency structure, not just a rule report
A live map of how files, imports and routes connect, with the high-blast-radius hubs highlighted.
Learn more →Where SonarQube is strong
SonarQube is a deep, well-established quality gate — a large body of language rules, tight CI integration, and a long track record enforcing standards on every commit. Mapnostics does not replace a quality gate. It answers a question a gate cannot: how does this system fit together, and where is the risk concentrated? Teams often keep both — SonarQube on the commit, Mapnostics on the architecture.
Get your codebase health score in under 2 minutes.
Analyze my codebase →No credit card required · Free tier available
This comparison reflects our view of each product's public positioning as of September 2026. Both tools change — evaluate them against your own needs.