OUTSOURCING TRANSITION
Bringing development back in-house, or switching vendors?
Capture what the outgoing team knows — why each part of the code exists, not just what it does — before they are gone. Mapnostics reads it from the repository, so the transfer does not depend on their goodwill.
Why the code exists, not just what it does
The Intent Map explains the purpose of each file and capability, with an evidence block separating what was measured from what was inferred — the context that usually leaves with the outgoing team.
Learn more →A knowledge-transfer document that stays current
A reading guide generated from the repository, so the in-house team inherits a map of the real system instead of a handover deck written in the vendor's last week.
Learn more →No dependency on the previous vendor
The analysis reads the code and its git history directly. You do not need the outgoing team available to answer questions to produce it.
Learn more →Also check key-person risk — who owns each part of the code, read from commit history, so you know exactly what knowledge is leaving. On the agency side of the same transition? See agency client handover.
Capture the codebase knowledge in under 2 minutes.
Analyze the codebase →No credit card required · Free tier available
Common questions
How do I capture what an outgoing vendor knows before they leave?
Read it from the repository. The Intent Map explains why each part of the code exists, not just what it does, without depending on the outgoing team to explain it first.
How do I do knowledge transfer without the previous team?
Generate the analysis directly from the code and its git history, so the transfer does not depend on the outgoing vendor's availability or goodwill.
Does this identify who really owns each part of the code?
Yes. Key-person risk reads git history to show who owns each part of the codebase, and exactly what knowledge leaves if they do.