AI CODE SPRAWL
Half your code is AI-generated and nobody reviewed the architecture.
Coding agents shipped faster than anyone could review the design. Mapnostics reads the structure that actually shipped — module boundaries, dependency hotspots, and a health score across six measured dimensions.
How to track the technical debt AI-generated code leaves behind
The architecture that actually shipped
A dependency graph read from the code as it stands now, so you can see the structure the agents produced — not the one anyone planned.
Learn more →Find the hotspots first
The most-connected files are ranked, so the parts of the codebase where a change has the widest blast radius are the parts you review first.
Learn more →A health score across six dimensions
One number from 0 to 100, deducted for dead code, zombie code, oversized files, low test coverage, exposed secrets and duplication — the debt AI volume tends to leave behind.
Learn more →The Intent Map goes one layer deeper — what each file is for, with a block separating what was measured from what was inferred. Bringing new engineers onto this codebase? See developer onboarding. And pasted code pastes its keys along with it — the secrets detection tool catches them before production.
See your real architecture in under 2 minutes.
Analyze my codebase →No credit card required · Free tier available
Common questions
How do I review AI-generated code at scale?
Read the dependency graph and health score of the code that actually shipped — the module boundaries, dependency hotspots and dead code — rather than reviewing agent output diff by diff.
Can AI-generated code create technical debt?
Yes, especially when volume outpaces review: duplicated logic, oversized files and dead code accumulate the same way they would from any team, just faster.
How do I find the riskiest parts of an AI-heavy codebase?
The most-connected files in the dependency graph carry the widest blast radius — start your review there.